The study, explained
Objectives, activities, participant criteria and the limits of what the work can answer.
You know the product inside out. Research helps you understand the person using it: what they are trying to do, where they use it and what gets in their way.
The task, in contextModerated usability sessions
A working product or a testable prototype, with the tasks that matter.
Observe attempts at agreed tasks and ask about the experience.
Usability issues with supporting observations and a discussion of findings with your team.
A recurring routine calls for different research from a task someone cannot complete. An early idea raises different questions from a product already in use.
We help teams define the question, choose an appropriate approach and prepare the work so the findings can be used afterward.
How a study can take shapeConversations grounded in a person’s experience, language and context.
Observed attempts at agreed tasks using a product or a testable prototype.
A way to follow repeated activity and the circumstances around it.
A structured look at comprehension, relevance and the questions an idea raises.
Agree what the team needs to understand, what is already known and the decision the work will inform.
Prepare the activities and materials, then pay attention to what people do and how they describe it.
Connect observations to the product question. Keep interpretations, limitations and unresolved points visible.

A discussion guide gives a conversation direction. It should also leave space for a participant to describe the experience in their own terms.
We distinguish what someone says from what we infer, and return to the evidence when the story becomes too neat.
The research practiceA readout should help people return to the work after the presentation. We agree the outputs with the brief and keep their relationship to the evidence clear.
Inside the research handoverObjectives, activities, participant criteria and the limits of what the work can answer.
Themes or usability issues linked to supporting material, with interpretation identified as interpretation.
A team conversation about what to change, what to examine further and what remains unresolved.
No. Begin with the product question and the decision the work will inform. We discuss whether interviews, observed tasks, diaries or concept work fit that question.
The question, the product stage, what the team already knows and any timing or access constraints. Existing support themes or research can be useful context.
Observer access, participant consent and recording arrangements are agreed as part of the study. We prepare observers to separate notes about what happened from their interpretation.
The scope sets the outputs. These can include a study summary, supporting observations, themes or annotated issues, recommendations and a team readout.